top of page
Writer's pictureMSF

Transparency Troubles: Moran's Committee Proposal Fuels Debate Over City Purchasing

Accounts Commissioner, Dillon Moran, the City Purchasing Agent, faces mounting criticism for his failure to adhere to established purchasing guidelines, a matter he openly acknowledged during a recent City Council meeting. In an attempt to address these concerns, Moran has put forward a proposal to establish a purchasing committee, slated for discussion at the upcoming 2/6/24 City Council meeting. The committee will be spearheaded by his Assistant Purchasing Agent, Stephanie Richards, who will oversee the training of its members, handpicked by Moran himself.

Why This Proposal Raises Alarms

There are several glaring issues with Moran's plan:

1. Lack of Accountability: As the City Purchasing Agent, Moran ultimately bears responsibility for procurement decisions. The need for external professional training, not just within Moran's department but also for Moran himself, is evident given the track record of purchasing mishaps.

2. Neglect of Essential Roles: Moran's failure to expedite the appointment of a Director of Risk and Safety, a crucial role in the purchasing process, further underscores the inadequacy of establishing a committee without necessary prerequisites in place.

Implications for Short-Term Rental Oversight

Moran's missteps in procurement are particularly pronounced in the case of the Short-Term Rental Compliance Monitoring Software:

1. Questionable RFP Process: Despite receiving proposals from various vendors, Moran's decision to award the contract to Granicus, and not the lowest cost bidder at $56,696.45 annually, raises eyebrows, especially considering the absence of comprehensive legislation governing short-term rentals.


2. Legal Ambiguity: Moran's intention to model proposed legislation after an existing bill raises concerns about legal uncertainty and the prudence of basing city regulations on pending legislation.

3. Lack of Public Involvement: Moran's failure to conduct requisite public hearings further exacerbates the lack of transparency surrounding the implementation of short-term rental regulations.


Financial Inconsistencies

The financial irregularities surrounding the allocation of funds for the short-term rental software further compound the issue:

1. Conflicting Budget Allocation: Discrepancies between budget allocations and proposed fund usage, as highlighted by Moran's proposal to utilize 2022 funds for a contract awarded in 2023, raise questions about financial management practices. Moran wants to use 2022 funds for a 2023 award of bid for a 2024 Short Term Rental Registry based on legislation that doesn’t exist.  Will Sangvhi, who is running for State Senate, support this bizarre funding scheme?



2. Contractual Confusion: The absence of clear procedures for contract execution and management, evidenced by multiple proposal submissions and staffing changes within Granicus, underscores the need for stringent oversight.



Challenges Ahead

The proposal to establish a purchasing committee, led by individuals closely affiliated with Moran, fails to address the systemic issues plaguing procurement practices. The lack of transparency, accountability, and adherence to established protocols undermines public trust and necessitates comprehensive reforms rather than superficial solutions. As the city grapples with the complexities of regulatory oversight, a fundamental reassessment of procurement policies and practices is imperative to ensure fiscal responsibility and effective governance.


315 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page